When an article cites a study, do you open the source?
Every claim on this site links to a primary source. We want to know whether readers actually follow those links, or whether they are there mainly as a promise that the claim could be checked.
-
Almost always 100% · 1
I read the source before I trust the claim
-
Sometimes 0% · 0
only when the claim surprises me
-
Rarely 0% · 0
the citation being there is enough
-
Never 0% · 0
I read for the summary, not the evidence
1 member has voted.
Sign in to vote. Reading the results needs no account. Sign in · Create an account
The raw counts
| Answer | Votes | Share of voters |
|---|---|---|
| Almost always | 1 | 100% |
| Sometimes | 0 | 0% |
| Rarely | 0 | 0% |
| Never | 0 | 0% |
| Members who voted | 1 |
How this poll works
- One vote per verified member. Signing up needs a confirmed email address, which is what keeps one person to one vote.
- Members can change their answer while the poll is open. Once it closes, the numbers stop moving.
- These are raw counts. Nothing is weighted, adjusted or estimated, and no answers are removed.
- This is a poll of the people who read this site, not a representative sample of any population. Read it as what our members think, nothing wider.
The numbers are available as machine-readable JSON under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them freely, with a link back.